Sidan 1 av 2 12 SistaSista
Resultat 1 till 15 av 18
  1. #1
    Väpnare Hu1s avatar
    Reg.datum
    2009 Apr
    Inlägg
    140
    Rykte
    51
    Tack
    1
    Tackad: 4 gånger i 4 inlägg

    User:Vir in the English section

    User:Vir

    User:Vir worked between August 26 2012 and October 26 2012 in the English metapedia.

    The articles he modified:

    Race and crime
    Racial realism
    White flight
    Countries and intelligence
    Immigration and crime
    Racial taxonomy ‎
    IQ and the Wealth of Nations ‎
    Richard Lynn ‎
    Race and health ‎
    Kevin MacDonald
    Jewish group evolutionary strategy ‎
    Jewish influence
    The Culture of Critique series
    Jews and intelligence
    Khazar Jews
    The Mismeasure of Man
    The Occidental Quarterly
    National Policy Institute
    David Duke

    He deleted numerous images from the "Race" oriented articles, and re-wrote numerous passages in these articles. If well, or not, should be checked by an expert of racial sciences.

    His behaviour was rather unpeaceful, he wordly hunted to create conflicts. He tried to instigate conflicts. Finally he insisted to state, that the Khazar origin denial of Kevin Mc Donald is absolutely righteous. He never helped in any admin activities or vandalismus elimination.

    He is since the 14-th of November 2014 user Upplysning in the English section, having admin and bureaucrat rights. He is adding strange articles supporting Ethnic heterogeinity, removing valid statements about the problems with counting of Jews and links to the German section, and removing criticism of KevinMcDonald Khazar theory denial.

    He also restarted unpeaceful behaviour. According to his opinion other editors are "crackpots", "intruders", and so on.

    For example, on 15-th of November Windows7Guy100 vandalised article National Socialism. User:Galileo fixed the vandalism and banned the user as a warning for a short time. User Upplysning did not move his finger to do anything. However, on 18-th November he attacked User:Galileo, why he just blocked shortly = warned that user. The user is not new, he did already some seemingly usual editing, warning is usual in such cases.

    User:Vir/Upplysning personality does not allow him to work in groups. He just sees his point of view, he can not peacefully discuss controversial subjects, other users are at best crackpots or intruders for him. He searches unpeace, and is not willing and also incapable to help doing administration tasks, especially vandal elimination. The opposite, his presence helps vandals, because he seeks unpeace and attacks other editors.
    Senast redigerad av Hu1 den 2014-11-18 klockan 21:55. Anledning: correction

  2. #2
    Administratör Daniel F.s avatar
    Reg.datum
    2007 Mar
    Inlägg
    1 240
    Rykte
    3777
    Tack
    663
    Tackad: 766 gånger i 262 inlägg
    The user "Upplysning" is a long-time contributor at the Swedish Metapedia, having created several hundreds of new, high-quality articles, and improved existing ones. I can vouch for him.

    I have no idea whether or not he is the same as "Vir", but I think not. What makes you think that "Upplysning" and "Vir" are the same person?

    And where did he add anything supporting ethnic heterogenity?
    “We are entering a time when words must be authenticated by deeds.” —Dominique Venner

    MOTPOL · METAPEDIA · ALTERNATIVE RIGHT · ARKTOS · DÉGÉNÉRATION


  3. #3
    Väpnare Hu1s avatar
    Reg.datum
    2009 Apr
    Inlägg
    140
    Rykte
    51
    Tack
    1
    Tackad: 4 gånger i 4 inlägg
    I checked editor Upplysning in the Swedish section.
    He registered 4 July 2012 in the Swedish section. He is a simple user, no admin or Bureaucrat there.

    Some of his articles:
    Länder och IQ ‎ N
    Intelligenskvot N
    Människoraser N
    Vit flykt N
    Invandring och välfärd N
    Invandring och brottslighet ‎ N
    Invandring och opinion N
    Invandring och media N
    Invandringsprocessen N
    Brottsutvecklingen i Sverige N
    IQ and Global Inequality N
    Dysgenetik N
    Dysgenik N
    Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations ‎ N
    Richard Lynn N
    Tatu Vanhanen N
    Asylinvandring ‎ N
    Judiskt inflytande ‎ N
    Evolutionspsykologi N
    Judar ‎ - added Infyltidar & Demography
    Etnisk heterogenitet ‎ N

    Where N means, he is the author and in most cases the only contributor.
    The subject is identical to Vir's subjects: Racial and etnical stuff,
    IQ, Richard Lynn, Jews.

    Since in the Swedish section in most cases he is the only contributor,
    there is no room for conflicts.

    In the English section we had already articles in these subjects.
    Vir removed numerous images and re-wrote large paragraphs, that
    naturally causes, that admins, who are worth the name admin, check, what is he doing.

    The possible vandalisms:
    Removing valid content
    Removing good images
    Adding senseless blabla (We had this kind of vandalism in the English section earlier, multiple users, especially MasqueMeline, about 20 articles)
    ...

    In case of Vir:
    From the article Race_and_crime for example he wanted to remove a wikipedia image, that
    shows, that Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder saying, it is not necessary. However, an image says more than thousand words.

    He did not want to have hints in the Jews article about official number of Jews, which is according to many people, among others by Mark Twain, largely underestimated.

    He did not want to have hints in the Kevin MacDonald article to the fact, that MacDonald denies the Khazar origin of Jews, which is believed by many Jews and non Jews, and proven by many facts.

    Why is Upplysning identical to Vir.
    1. Upplysning registered July 2012 in the Swedish section and Vir August 2012 in the English one.
    2. Vir handled solely subjects, Upplysning handles.
    3. Upplysning now adds the changes, he wanted to add, but could not add, as Vir.
    3.1 Removes hints, that Kevin McDonald denies Khazar theory, even though that is fact.
    3.2 Removes hints, that Jews official count is questionable, even thought this is a broadly acknowledged fact. Even Mark Twain wrote about his.
    4. He is full of hate and vengeance first against myself, second against Galileo, probably also against Basileus - more than the half of the usual and regularly active editors.

    The problem with his Ethnic heterogeneity article is, that he writes: "A 2004 study in the UK found that higher ethnic heterogeneity in an area was associated with lower life satisfaction.". However, the study, he gives as a "proof" for that statement (https://www.ipsos-mori.com/Assets/Do...ple_122004.pdf) in no place says that. Therefore this kind of "proof" is fallacious, and can be used against Metapedia.

    Of course, if Vir/Upplysning is the main administrator in the English section, the non plus ultra, and if anybody says his opinion, that does not match 100% with the great leader's opinion, will be blocked or stripped some or all rights, as "crackpot" and what other names he still assigns to other admins (if any at all), this will be the quality level of the English section. Not to mention vandalism and a kind of disorder, we had in the past, that could well return.
    Senast redigerad av Hu1 den 2014-11-19 klockan 23:05. Anledning: correction

  4. #4
    Riddare Spoofs avatar
    Reg.datum
    2009 Nov
    Inlägg
    266
    Rykte
    532
    Tack
    15
    Tackad: 113 gånger i 69 inlägg
    You highlight some important points. The obvious one is that on Metapedia there are very few contributors. On swedish Metapedia there have at any given time not been more than 2-4 active users posting on a regular basis. This gives a lot of freedom for users to design there own articles where often they are the only contributor.

    Hence, if someone else is modifying an article there can be a conflict since the author thinks he "owns" the article and is not used to other people changing it. Or having second opinions.

    Regarding the "500 milion jews" statement i agree with Upplysning and Daniel that this is a totaly false and crackpot statement and should be removed. All scholars agree that there are no more that 13-20 million jews worldwide. To put any higher number goes against all known knowledge and common sense. There are people that think the earth is flat, should we listen to them too?

    I havent read every article in english Metapedia but from my (european) horizon there is a lot of "Hollywoodnazism" in many articles meaning that one sees jewish conspiracys behind every corner in a very tiresome way and uses very harsh and derogatory remarks in the text which is not really suitable in a encyclopedia. There are better ways to get your point across than using harsh language.

  5. Följande användare säger Tack till Spoof för detta inlägg:

    Daniel F. (2014-11-20)

  6. #5
    Väpnare Hu1s avatar
    Reg.datum
    2009 Apr
    Inlägg
    140
    Rykte
    51
    Tack
    1
    Tackad: 4 gånger i 4 inlägg
    To say more precisely: The 500 million value was just a reference to the German section, and when Vir/Upplysning removed the demography parts of the article, even that link was already commented out.

  7. #6
    Odalbonde Kroms avatar
    Reg.datum
    2014 Nov
    Inlägg
    16
    Rykte
    11
    Tack
    0
    Tackad: 1 gång i 1 inlägg
    The English Metapedia has been used by certain individuals to abuse others for several years. There is absolutely shocking content there that is not moderated/removed: this ranges from loads of copyright violations + ridiculous libellous "hit-articles" since at least 2011.

    Example -

    http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Weller

    Douglas Weller (born 14 January 1941 in Miami, Florida), also known as Dougweller, Margaret and Witch from Lancre, is an American Southern Poverty Law Center activist and administrator of Wikipedia who's adding Europhobic propaganda to political and racial articles. He has moved to the United Kingdom and used to work for the Birmingham City Council but is now retired. He's an amateur archaeologist interested in pseudohistory subjects such as Atlantis[1]. Evidence has been published on Stormfront showing he's a homosexual predator who cruises for casual sex with strangers in public restrooms, that his HIV status is unsure, and that he hasn't told his wife about any of that.
    First of all let me say Doug Weller has a bad reputation across the internet. He's a Wikipedia admin that is known to be a bit of a pseudo-intellectual and troublemaker (he holds no qualifications in archaeology but is notorious for attacking other peoples credentials in this subject or calling them "fringe"/pseudo-archaeologists or whatever). However the Metapedia article calls him a sodomite, homosexual predator etc. No evidence is presented for this claim. It links to a dodgy stormfront post from a poster who goes around calling anyone he doesn't like homosexuals or paedophiles without providing any evidence.

    Douglas, also using the RamtopsDweller nickname, has an alternate identity; Margaret (witchfromlancre). As Margaret, she explains to us that her fantasy is to have a partner who is 38 years old, which is also, coincidentally, the age of her imaginary son
    Yet Margaret, is his wife. All this person has done is google his name and found his wife, then bizarrely claims it is doug weller himself as a transsexual or whatever. Totally idiotic.

  8. #7
    Odalbonde Upplysnings avatar
    Reg.datum
    2013 Mar
    Inlägg
    31
    Rykte
    8
    Tack
    0
    Tackad: 3 gånger i 3 inlägg
    Citat Ursprungligen postat av Hu1 Visa inlägg
    Vir/Upplysning
    Yes, I had an account using that name. Was banned for one week for daring to question your crackpot view that there are 500 million Jews and that Kevin MacDonald is a Jew-lover. Saw no reason to return to the English Metapedia so I contributed to the Swedish Metapedia instead.

    Thought it better to use the same name as in the Swedish Metapedia and Nordisk for clarity when I returned.

    I will let my article contributions regarding the areas I know something about speak for themselves.
    Citat Ursprungligen postat av Spoof Visa inlägg
    I havent read every article in english Metapedia but from my (european) horizon there is a lot of "Hollywoodnazism" in many articles meaning that one sees jewish conspiracys behind every corner in a very tiresome way and uses very harsh and derogatory remarks in the text which is not really suitable in a encyclopedia. There are better ways to get your point across than using harsh language.
    Citat Ursprungligen postat av Krom Visa inlägg
    The English Metapedia has been used by certain individuals to abuse others for several years. There is absolutely shocking content there that is not moderated/removed: this ranges from loads of copyright violations + ridiculous libellous "hit-articles" since at least 2011.
    Agree with all of the above. The fault is ultimately with the administrators who have allowed this. Or more correctly, many administrators have actively themselves contributed to these problems.

    Not sure exactly how to fix the current problems. I will make an attempt to at least fix "Hollywoodnazism" and derogatory language in the articles I edit.

  9. #8
    Väpnare Hu1s avatar
    Reg.datum
    2009 Apr
    Inlägg
    140
    Rykte
    51
    Tack
    1
    Tackad: 4 gånger i 4 inlägg
    The main problem with User:Vir I wrote into the talk page of article Jews:
    I do not think, it is a good idea, if [[User:Vir|Vir]] deletes large portions of carefully built central articles , like this one. Therefore I reverted these deletions. Please in the future discuss on the talk page any deletions before doing. Also [[User:Vir|Vir]] eliminated a lot of illustrations from race articles, like Negroe skulls and the like, which seem to me also not that constructive contribution. [[User:Hu1|Hu1]] 10:45, 21 October 2012 (CEST)

    User:Vir's deletions can be seen here:
    http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?...4&oldid=230151
    http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?...4&oldid=230155

    The problem was not daring to ask something, but daring to delete images and daring to delete large portions of articles , that were built by numerous people in consens with the rest of the community. For User:Vir/Upplysning the others are unfortunately just "intruders" and "crackpots."

    User:Vir was blocked for 1 week because of agressive behaviour:
    10:10, 26 October 2012 Hu1 (Talk | contribs) blocked Vir (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 week (account creation disabled, e-mail blocked) ‎ (Intimidating behaviour/harassment)

  10. #9
    Odalbonde Upplysnings avatar
    Reg.datum
    2013 Mar
    Inlägg
    31
    Rykte
    8
    Tack
    0
    Tackad: 3 gånger i 3 inlägg
    Citat Ursprungligen postat av Hu1 Visa inlägg
    The main problem with User:Vir I wrote into the talk page of article Jews:
    I do not think, it is a good idea, if [[User:Vir|Vir]] deletes large portions of carefully built central articles , like this one. Therefore I reverted these deletions. Please in the future discuss on the talk page any deletions before doing. Also [[User:Vir|Vir]] eliminated a lot of illustrations from race articles, like Negroe skulls and the like, which seem to me also not that constructive contribution. [[User:Hu1|Hu1]] 10:45, 21 October 2012 (CEST)

    User:Vir's deletions can be seen here:
    http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?...4&oldid=230151
    http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?...4&oldid=230155

    The problem was not daring to ask something, but daring to delete images and daring to delete large portions of articles , that were built by numerous people in consens with the rest of the community. For User:Vir/Upplysning the others are unfortunately just "intruders" and "crackpots."

    User:Vir was blocked for 1 week because of agressive behaviour:
    10:10, 26 October 2012 Hu1 (Talk | contribs) blocked Vir (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 week (account creation disabled, e-mail blocked) ‎ (Intimidating behaviour/harassment)
    Dishonest description. I stopped trying to edit the article when there were objections and had a very long discussion on the talk page regarding the 500 million Jews, Kevin MacDonald and the Khazar theory. Regardless, you blocked me five days later for wanting some neutrality in descriptions about Kevin MacDonald (who you defamed as having Jewish masters based on absolutely nothing except not agreeing with you on the Khazar theory [http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?...&oldid=231141]) and Khazar theory (which you described as the single truth).

    In short, I left Metapedia, and you could successfully declare without any more opposition that there are 500 million Jews and that Kevin MacDonald has Jewish masters.
    Senast redigerad av Upplysning den 2014-11-20 klockan 22:13.

  11. #10
    Väpnare Hu1s avatar
    Reg.datum
    2009 Apr
    Inlägg
    140
    Rykte
    51
    Tack
    1
    Tackad: 4 gånger i 4 inlägg
    Citat Ursprungligen postat av Upplysning Visa inlägg
    Dishonest description. I stopped trying to edit the article when there were objections and had a very long discussion on the talk page regarding the 500 million Jews, Kevin MacDonald and the Khazar theory. Regardless, you blocked me five days later for wanting some neutrality in descriptions about Kevin MacDonald (who you defamed as having Jewish masters based on absolutely nothing except not agreeing with you on the Khazar theory [http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?...&oldid=231141]) and Khazar theory (which you described as the single truth).

    In short, I left Metapedia, and you could successfully declare without any more opposition that there are 500 million Jews and that Kevin MacDonald has Jewish masters.
    The link you give just shows, that I entered the word "explanations" into the KevinMcDonald text. This link is almost as false, as the link in the Ethnic heterogeneity article. If you check the leader list and supporter list of the University, where Kevin McDonald teaches, you will see, that the "Jewish masters" statement is far from being false. Why would he otherwise deny Khazar conversion theory, which is proven by several Jewish sources, however, unpleasant for Zionists?

    The links I gave show, that you subsequentially modified large portions of an article, even though several editors told you clearly, this is not the way, Metapedia works. This kind of working is vandal-like. That's why admins stopped you.

    I never stated, the 500 million figures are correct, not even in my opinion, I just added a hint to the German section:
    The German Metapedia uses the factor 37.5, and estimates the correct count as 500 millions.[22] This can be checked here: http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?...r&oldid=380533
    Even if you state thousands of times the opposite.

    In the forum article you defame me
    False statements and accusations against Kevin MacDonald by Hu1
    I asked you, why you do not go to the English section, and discuss there. You had the chance there, to answer, you tried as User:Vir, but you were not successfull. A honest person would have answered that. But honesty is not your strength.

    Also the link in the Ethnic heterogeneity article shows, that you do not take at all serious with honesty. Metapedia enemies will say "They do not have any proof for their statements. The fact, that they present fallacious quotes shows, that they are not right."
    Senast redigerad av Hu1 den 2014-11-21 klockan 09:41. Anledning: correction

  12. Följande användare säger Tack till Hu1 för detta inlägg:

    Kepler (2014-11-22)

  13. #11
    Odalbonde Upplysnings avatar
    Reg.datum
    2013 Mar
    Inlägg
    31
    Rykte
    8
    Tack
    0
    Tackad: 3 gånger i 3 inlägg
    Citat Ursprungligen postat av Hu1 Visa inlägg
    The link you give just shows, that I entered the word "explanations" into the KevinMcDonald text. This link is almost as false, as the link in the Ethnic heterogeneity article. If you check the leader list and supporter list of the University, where Kevin McDonald teaches, you will see, that the "Jewish masters" statement is far from being false. Why would he otherwise deny Khazar conversion theory, which is proven by several Jewish sources, however, unpleasant for Zionists?

    The links I gave show, that you subsequentially modified large portions of an article, even though several editors told you clearly, this is not the way, Metapedia works. This kind of working is vandal-like. That's why admins stopped you.

    I never stated, the 500 million figures are correct, not even in my opinion, I just added a hint to the German section:
    The German Metapedia uses the factor 37.5, and estimates the correct count as 500 millions.[22] This can be checked here: http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?...r&oldid=380533
    Even if you state thousands of times the opposite.

    In the forum article you defame me
    False statements and accusations against Kevin MacDonald by Hu1
    I asked you, why you do not go to the English section, and discuss there. You had the chance there, to answer, you tried as User:Vir, but you were not successfull. A honest person would have answered that. But honesty is not your strength.

    Also the link in the Ethnic heterogeneity article shows, that you do not take at all serious with honesty. Metapedia enemies will say "They do not have any proof for their statements. The fact, that they present fallacious quotes shows, that they are not right."
    Kevin McDonald likely has tenure so he cannot be fired (which he likely would have been otherwise). I do not think anyone denies that the Khazars converted or that some Khazars may have moved to Europe but Kevin McDonald (and persons such as David Duke) likely thinks that most genetic evidence supports that this is not a major genetic influence. Anyway, it is not my purpose to declare the Khazar theory to be the only truth or not. Just to point out that being critical of the theory (as Kevin MacDonalad and David Duke) does not mean having Jewish masters.

    Actually, I stopped editing the Jews article and discussed on the talk page instead.

    Regarding the 350-500 millions Jews, se also this thread:
    http://www.nordisk.nu/showthread.php?t=60686

    You only made a minor edit regarding the number after I started this thread here on Nordisk. http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?...2&oldid=380533

    Stating 140 million... Still crackpot. Note that you only made this change after I started the discussion here. As long as I only dicussed on the English Metapedia, your response was simply to ban me.

  14. #12
    Odalbonde A Wyatt Mans avatar
    Reg.datum
    2014 Nov
    Inlägg
    13
    Rykte
    5
    Tack
    0
    Tackad: 0 gånger i 0 inlägg
    In September 2014 Aurvandil came and in response to Veronica Clark complaining I guess via email (though I've emailed the metapedia main email before years ago never heard any responses) he removed her photo. Aurvandil has rarely showed up since 2012 except to in 2013 give someone sysop powers and angrily tell people not to use copyrighted photos. The photos are all of gentiles, not of jews, that he's upset about. They also weren't famous.

    I actually never even noticed Aurvandil before. I had originally thought NatAll75 ran things. It's rather difficult to tell who owns and runs the site. Metapedia itself doesn't say nor does anyone's userpage I can find say they are the owner or head of Metapedia. Wikipedia gives two real names of people, but I don't know if they are around or their usernames. So to my knowledge Aurvandil is the head of Metapedia.

    In September 2014 after Aurvandil removed it, http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?...action=history Hu1 replaced it with another and then Basileus changed it to another. In November 2014, Aurvandil
    returned. He blocked Basileus for 3 months and desysoped Hu1.

    Aurvandil then immediately gave full powers to Upplysning. With these two actions, I got the impression that Upplysning is Aurvandil's right-hand-man on the English Metapedia now and that all the major changes Upplysning does are at Aurvandil's behest.

    Upplysning immediately went about changing things, removing stuff. I am aware of three main things Aurvandil did not like (1) photos of non-notable gentiles in articles, (2) the 500 million jews in the world claim, (3) "Libelous articles about living people will be deleted immediately and may result in a ban." I'm sure there's others since wikis are by nature imperfect. In my opinion, the way improve quality is to increase the number of people adding content. People write thousands of pages a day on forums and blogs of content, and not adding it in here. I follow what I can and add it but it's a big task and unfortunately the people putting it on forums and blogs while they link to Metapedia, don't actually come by and add it. I don't know why people often link to Metapedia but rarely edit it. I know some editors are the type where they wll make articles and then immediately revert any other editor's new content, even a few words, so maybe they prefer blogging where they are the only one to write their content. Whatever the reason, the lack of editors should be investigated. The German Metapedia appears to have more active editing than the other ones, so perhaps what got people going there can be studied and copied.

    Upplysning also made articles. The articles are very well researched, but they are huge walls of text that the layman would have difficulty understanding and would lack the attention span to read all of so putting simple pictures around would be needed. On Ethnic heterogeneity, Galileo tried to help out by adding text. Upplysning quickly removed it. The pages of arguing on the talk page did not allow them to reach agreement, only dislike. At the end of it, Aurvandil returned, he affirmed that Upplysning is his right-hand-man on the English metapedia now, and desysoped Galileo.

    Aurvandil later desysopped the banned Basileus for the "Orangemike" and "Dave Snowden" articles. Hu1, Basileus, and Galileo were three top content-adders on the English Metapedia. Hu1 and Galileo both basically stopped adding content after being desysopped.


    My encounter with Upplysning started out how I don't like. My vision is bad and I accidentally clicked rollback when I was trying to click something else. I've never done that before and I think the only time here it's happened was once and it accidentally happened when someone rolled back me (though they forgot to undo it). I immediately rolledback what I did but there was no space for an edit summary, so I promptly apologized on Upplysning's talk page. I received no response as to whether he's mad at me or forgives me, though shortly after that he went to an article, removed a paragraph I wrote, a picture I added, and a paragraph Mikemikev added. In the edit summary, he sounded he didn't realize I had added it and the text I added was a very long time ago so he wouldn't know. The picture though is easy to tell who wrote it. I argued with him about it on the talk page and he refused to budge in the slightest. I also had to stay up 4 hours past when I needed to go to sleep to deal with this as unused images tend to be deleted quickly and if it was, it's harder to discuss it. During this time, Mikemikev also came by on another account Dave to defend the Mikemikev's contributions Upplysning. It was obvious that it was Mikemikev but I didn't want to block him immediately because I thought letting him argue with Upplysning about removed content would help us find if he has other accounts since we all know he's probably snuck back on with another account since Dave is banned.

    I now realize I made a mistake. I should have blocked him with a vague "sock puppet of blocked user". Then used the email function to tell Upplysning why and then tell the user to turn on email if they want more ban details. Why the secrecy? When Mikemikev was desysopped and banned, vandals from Encyclopedia Dramatica did this kind of thing http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?...5&oldid=283678 and I thought if less is said the less likely they'll add stuff to page on him. Dave's block message read "sockpuppet of banned user Mikemikev" and I just checked now and see the stuff about Dave has been updated to his article there. It is best if we keep it off. Below are more links:
    https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Basileus
    https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Hu1
    https://encyclopediadramatica.se/ind...e&oldid=690170
    https://encyclopediadramatica.se/ind...#Basileus_gone
    https://encyclopediadramatica.se/ind...araldBluetooth


    Now...

    http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?...7&oldid=382156
    I tried to give a friendly welcome message to Upplysning, however he removed it saying I insulted him, which was not my intention and he misunderstood me. I have distant cousins in Sweden I visited once, though other family visited them more often. The cousins in Sweden used to live in Stockholm and they moved out a couple of years back due to the mass immigration that invaded the major cities.

    He made Arguments regarding the existence of races, and I added ‎one sentence pointing out the genetic distance between Subsaharan Africans and Eurasians is vast. Upplysning removed it. I explained it on the talk page but so far he hasn't used it. I thought it would really help his points in the article. Coyotes, dogs, and the different wolf types are labelled as different species. Brown bears and polar bears interbreeding is considered a tragedy by zoologists (there's tons of new articles saying this) http://www.spiegel.de/international/...-a-859218.html


    In conclusion, I think the job one does at the English Metapedia relates to how much of it shows up in Encyclopedia Dramatica. Anything added to that site is a bad sign and we should strive to keep Encyclopedia Dramatica from documenting anything else.
    Senast redigerad av A Wyatt Man den 2014-11-23 klockan 06:18. Anledning: I made typos.

  15. #13
    Odalbonde A Wyatt Mans avatar
    Reg.datum
    2014 Nov
    Inlägg
    13
    Rykte
    5
    Tack
    0
    Tackad: 0 gånger i 0 inlägg
    Upplysning is continuing to going around article to article, removing every single contribution I ever made. When Upplysning edits an article, it is now his and he doesn't want anyone else's contributions on it. He removes them all. He was in the English Metapedia and couldn't get along with anyone. He now is in complete control over everyone who he hates.

    Words cannot describe how bad this decision is. Let's give an anlogy. Suppose a company had a bad employee who got in fights with the other employees. The bad employee was put on a week suspension but allowed to come back. The employee then quit. The owner of the company then replaces the top management with the bad employee and says everyone must follow the bad employee. The bad employee makes life hell for everyone at the company and they all quit.

    Upplysning was only blocked for a week, never banned. Hu1 made the same one week block to me when I was new and later Hu1 recommended me for administrator.

    Just to clarify, Upplysning and everyone on the English Metapedia didn't get along. Okay now the owner of all the Metapedia puts Upplysning in charge of everyone on the English Metapedia. Right? Follow so far. Just going by theory do you think things will be good from this?

    The English Metapedia has few contributors and Upplysning drives them away. I have no interest in editing there myself if Upplysning is going to systematically target all my hard work and remove it.

  16. #14
    Odalbonde Kroms avatar
    Reg.datum
    2014 Nov
    Inlägg
    16
    Rykte
    11
    Tack
    0
    Tackad: 1 gång i 1 inlägg
    A Wyatt Man, Upplysning showed you are a total dumbass and cannot read basic scientific data. You've posted across Metapedia that blacks are closer to chimpanzees in DNA and misread two sources to show this. He then removed those claims. He's also removing some of the other nonsense you've been posting which just appears to be crude VVN-type racism comparing blacks to apes etc. You basically come across as a low IQ skinhead. The sort of stuff you "contribute", lmao:

    http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Mudshark

  17. #15
    Odalbonde Kroms avatar
    Reg.datum
    2014 Nov
    Inlägg
    16
    Rykte
    11
    Tack
    0
    Tackad: 1 gång i 1 inlägg
    The truth is the English Metapedia had serious potential to become a successful politically incorrect version of Wikipedia: a refuge for former serious editors and even sysops who perhaps were banned or censored on certain articles. Instead however Metapedia seems to have attracted 99% of loons: people using the site for personal vendettas or to abuse others (Basileus), cranks e.g. Galileo uploading extreme pseudo-science on physics, to Hu1 posting 500 million Jews exist, and just very unpleasant posters like A Wyatt Man, who just use the site to post crude racism (blacks are apes etc). The latter just makes people click off it and not take it serious. To top it off Mikemikev was allowed to join and even granted admin privileges. Mikemikev is a total mental-case sockpupeteer with multiple personality disorder who impersonates different people across the internet, and hence has been banned all over the place. He was most recently banned on another site pretending to be Korean man looking for a gay relationship with a black male called "KimJihyun". You only had to google his name to all find this.

Sidan 1 av 2 12 SistaSista

Liknande ämnen

  1. Svar: 0
    Senaste inlägg: 2014-04-06, 22:02
  2. Svar: 0
    Senaste inlägg: 2010-11-24, 10:41
  3. Svar: 1
    Senaste inlägg: 2010-11-20, 16:16
  4. Spanish section
    Av DERZEEMAN i forum International sections
    Svar: 2
    Senaste inlägg: 2010-06-12, 23:06
  5. German section
    Av Tysker i forum International sections
    Svar: 5
    Senaste inlägg: 2010-05-21, 12:09

Taggar för det här ämnet

Bokmärken

Behörigheter för att posta

  • Du får inte posta nya ämnen
  • Du får inte posta svar
  • Du får inte posta bifogade filer
  • Du får inte redigera dina inlägg
  •