From http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Kevin_MacDonald
When IQ researchers are talking about a high average "Jewish" IQ, then they are only referring to that of Ashkenazi Jews. Outside of Israel, 95% of all Jews are Ashkenazi so it is almost the same thing there. But in Israel the Ashkenazi Jews are only a small part of the population which also consists of Oriental Jews, Sephardic Jews and Arabs. None of these groups have a high average IQ which makes the average IQ of Israel low. Se for example Richard Lynn's book "The Chosen People: A Study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement." The person(s) making these claims is either utterly ignorant of what IQ research is stating or is a deliberate liar trying to discredit Kevin MacDonald."Mr. McDonald depicts Jews, as higher-than-average verbal intelligence people. This is not true. Jews' intelligence is at most average, more probable lightly below average. Israel's average IQ is 90 with over 80% Jewish inhabitants, whilst European countries have typically over 100 IQ"
Chart: http://www.pnas.org/content/97/12/67...expansion.html5. DNS check (see image) clearly proves Khazar connections."
Not going to go into a discussion about the Khazar theory in general here. Just going to point out that this chart which supposedly "clearly proves Khazar connections" most certainly do not. The chart (from a fifteen years old study using very limited genetic data) indicates that Ashkenazi Jews (marked "Ash "in the chart) are genetically close to various other Jewish, Middle Eastern and South European Populations. I guess that the evidence that "clearly proves Khazar connections" is supposed to be that Turks ("Tur") are one of these populations. Well, based on that such "reasoning" one could as well state that the chart is "evidence" for that the Ashkenazi Jews are "clearly" in fact Greeks ("Gre")! Or more likely Syrians ("Syr") who are the closest non-Jewish group in the chart. Or that the Italians and Syrians who are close to the Turks in the chart are descended from the Khazars!
The study from which chart is taken in fact states that "The results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora."
http://www.pnas.org/content/97/12/6769.long
So this particular old study is evidence AGAINST the Khazar theory and not evidence for it.
Also, the Turks have today very little Central Asian genetic ancestry remaining after a long time of mixing with other groups. So the Turks today are most likely not very genetically similar to the Khazars from Central Asia.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22332727
Anyhow, the old and limited study and chart is today superseded by much more recent and comprehensive studies using much more genetic data. There have been more recent studies both supporting and criticizing the Khazar theory. But citing this old chart as some kind of evidence for the Khazar theory is just weird. Especially when the study itself in fact argues against the Khazar theory. The person(s) citing this prominently as "evidence" that "clearly proves" the Khazar theory is either utterly ignorant or a deliberate liar.
Kevin MacDonald is certainly not mainstream academia.3. "The above shows, that Mr. McDonald's "research" results in explanations and values, his masters wish to get. His "White identity" ideas are his camouflage to avoid, the reader looks beyond his activities.
"Mainstream" academia (ie - those in the pay of the judeo-masonic plutocracy) support Ashkenazis as Bronze Age Semites for reasons of political Zionism."
The main author of these claims is "Hu1" although he also has some other supporters such as "Galileo" on the talk page of the article. They are also involved in the weird claim that there are 500 million Jews worldwide.
http://www.nordisk.nu/showthread.php?t=60686
Hu1 and whoever else is in his clique is greatly harming Metapedia by inserting such falsehoods and absurdities in important articles. They are also trying to discredit Kevin MacDonald as some kind of infiltrator. Why they doing this? In the worst case scenario is that they are infiltrators trying to discredit Metapedia and Kevin MacDonald by inserting garbage and lies.
A more benign interpretation is that they are just crackpots utterly ignorant of modern IQ and genetic research and utterly lacking in judgement ability regarding interpreting charts and demographics.
These false statements and accusations should be fixed but this seems unlikely to be done from inside the English Metapedia due to the influence this clique seems to have there. I will investigate the English Metapedia further to see if there are more lies and weird things going on.



Svara med citat


Bokmärken