Admo. of Spanish Metapedia admits that Metapedia's mission statement is not important

[Eosphoros]

Hej vänner.

By email, the general administrator of Spanish Metapedia, Walter Romero, admitted that he and his friend Fenix, and even a third person, Argentum, are not interested in fulfilling the Metapedia's Mission statement at all, when we talked about that "Another important purpose of Metapedia is to become a web resource for pro-European activists. Metapedia makes it easy for our cadres to expand their knowledge on various important subjects, and also functions as a searchable reference. Furthermore Metapedia gives us the opportunity to present a more balanced and fair image of the pro-European struggle for the general public as well as for academics..." He said:

"Esos son los objetivos impuestos por los identitarios europeístas (verdaderos dueños de Metapedia). Pero no son los objetivos primordiales de los creadores de la versión en español: mis objetivos, los de Fenix o los de Argentum".

"Those are the goals imposed by the European identitarists (true owners of Metapedia). But they aren't the primary objectives of the creators of the Spanish version: mine, Fenix or Argentum"

My question is: Should they continue being Metapedia administrators?

Thanks for your attention.

[DasGewisseEtwas]

I do not think that they should continue being Metapedia administrators. The conditions seem quite like in the German Metapedia. The de facto leader is Rauhreif (Polylux serves him), who is arrogant, dissembling and ignorant as I have described for instance here: http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/User_ta...rman_Metapedia And here: http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/User_ta...werden_sollten They do not care about the content, they care about “character” and “social behavior” and things like that. Like in the Soviet Union, intelligent people get banned because of being “unsocial” (or they have to leave before). So me, so Hu1 (ironically both administrators of English Metapedia because of being content-devoted contributors, the last also leader of the Hungarian Metapedia), Wissender1, Progressor, Hyperventilator, Turbo, Meldemann, Gerhard Kemme, Mastermind and perhaps a handful of others.

As the proposal of the thread starter is very similar, I would like to claim that Rauhreif and Polylux have to be banned because of anti-völkisch activities.

ed.: Rauhreif bluntly supports splitting here: http://www.nordisk.nu/showthread.php...960#post565960

[Hu1]

Dear Gewisse Etwas, the German metapedia had a big problem before Rauhref&Polylux took over. They had a chief admin, called Liberator germaniae, (admin and bürokrat) and also Waldgänger (as admin), than Volkstreu, than Mastermind than Pirmin, and also Weserbuerger. This person is very likely a jew, since he fills the metapedia with anti moslem propaganda, putting jews and whites into the same bin. He deletes brazenly and restless everything, that is uncomfortable for jews, for example connection between jews and bolshevists, remarks about jewish terror in Palestine, and he also fills the German metapedia with links to a jewish side called Pi-News, and fills metapedia with leftist pinko liberal bolshevist propaganda. Loveful articles about "poor, not understood, persecuted jews", presenting jews as non-jews, "persecuted" homosexuals, "persecuted" bolsheviks, and all the well known rest.

Rauhreif & Polylux did a lot for the German metapedia so far, write thousands of valuable articles, and even though their behaviour is sometimes a bit rough and vain, they are much better, than the liberal-pinko-bolshevist metapedia killer, Liberator germaniae & al.

I suggest you, to go back to german metapedia as a new user, and avoid strictly any critics on Rauhreif&Polylux, than you will find it quite nice. German metapedia has a lot of good written, valuable articles, and also information, that can only be found in metapedia. Please help also them.

[DasGewisseEtwas]

I know that there was such an admin who was a Jew friend or Jew. But this does not make Rauhreif and Polylux better absolutely. It is like these say that 1+1 is 8 and Liberator germaniae that 1+1 makes 18. The former is nearer to the correct, but both is completely unacceptable.

Rauhreif and Polylux do not have written thousands of valuable articles, the latter almost no article. The most articles are written by Franziska Knuppe and many by Wilhelm Schmitz, in addition of much mostly by banned authors and a bit by the recent authors. If you talk about valuable articles, Rauhreif probably has written a few dozen and harmed other articles times more, rather he complains about how bad the world is (as there most people would not know it) and why he “has to” ban everyone instead of thinking about himself first, what is more natural. One knows what I mean regarding the quality of Rauhreif’s articles compared with mine if one compares them and read what I say about and do with articles and what he says and does. His articles are bad sourced, inaccurate, unstructured and typographically horrible, and everywhere his formatting and typography is horrible. Looking at typography and formatting, look how the literature references which he adds look, for example in my article about the Rosslyn Chapel whose English edition I have expanded with this reference in a better format. Thou sayst that presenting an article is important! And I strongly agree, scientists care about well-formatted references and structure, if it is not built rightly, it is not credited. But I say inaccurate: And how much he invests into truthful information one can see by looking to his discussion page at the English Metapedia. He thinks his ego to be considerable, not true information, but true information is important to expose the Jews. Or if one is optimistic, he just has deficient eyes, what his ignorance is suggesting, but then he should go for his health’s sake.

Why should I go back as a new user, as he has suggested also, why doesn’t he just unban my old account? As I would make a new e-mail address and wait days to correct what he does not want because of his ego. I do not want that because of my honesty, a good kind of ego. That is what gentiles who smarm over Jews do.

You describe Rauhreif and Polylux as rough and vain, but isn’t that what especially Jews are?

At all, Rauhreif appears like Josef Stalin in his late life, and Polylux behaves like his Beria. Yes, Rauhreif lauded Stalin a handful of times. I can’t show you where as Metapedia is offline at present.

[Hu1]

Dear Gewisse Etwas,

I clearly remember, that Rauhreif did several hundred or even thousand articles from a valuable book considering martyrs of the national socialistic movement. If metapedia is online again, I will present you a more exact statistics. Polylux does primarily system maintenance, setting up menues, templates, and similar stuff, that he does quite well. It is quite useful to have someone for technical issues. Wilhelm Schmitz does a gut job in all subjects, and Franziska concentrates on Judeology, where she is an excellent expert, using good sources.

I also scanned and copied stuff from an old Hungarian lexicon 2007 and 2008, That's why we have over 85 thousand articles, therefore I know from own experience, that that is really a lot of work. I also did not get anything gifted.

They might be not perfect, but they are makers, and spent many hundred hours to help metapedia.

Jews are typically neither rough, nor vain. They are extremely goal oriented, their goal is clearly written in their talmud, they want to own everything, the non-jews worked for and they own at present. They work on this goal persisitently with all means, that we consider as unhonest and unfair.

To go back, you do not need a new email, you can use your old one. Just select a new name. Maybe, you could wait a while, until the waves are a bit more settled than they are now. He never unblocks users, this is one of his principles. Everybody has the right to have principles, why not he? I agree with you, they are not perfect, but the best we have at the moment. Try not to interfere with their work at first, write your own stuff, as you do in the English section, which works quite well now. It would be a pity, if you did not help them, because we are all metapedia.

About lauding Stalin: Stalin, who was a jew, did a good job 1937-1939, when he eliminated some very dangerous jews. I do not like him at all, neither anything, he represented, nevertheless, that was well done.

[Daniel F.]

Could anyone get the Spanish Metapedia administrator to come here and comment these charges? Or at least get in contact with me or someone else in the Metapedia Staff?

Regarding German Metapedia - I have complete faith in Rauhreif's and Polylux administration of German Metapedia and I am a bit surprised that DasGewitteEtwas who was recently appointed administrator of the English Metapedia already starts posting demands and accusations like these. Please don't make me regret your appointment.

[Ajarvarta]

At first: Thanks to "DGE" for standing up - and having a back - despite of being MP-"functionar". (Allfather will honorate this, from this point of view.)

At second: The really littlest "fair treatment" should be the possibility to correct one's one articles - past of differences - or "cut-offs". Else it would more seem like a "police headshot" instead of an "outbringing" from other articles. Why not cut them "new article change right of" - or perhaps also bring in a "sighting function" for authors, where "the self-pronounced excellence" is not sure about "modical questions"?. In facts, that are discussable, where no greater differences, known - from this point of view.

It seems more like an "nazi-shop" - where people don't want to hang your articles of the window - only because they have other opinions in viewing questions.

The should be a cut-off between "facting" and "showing".

We really don't need "archivars" that acts like in a "cloth-shop".

We need facts and prooven truth.

---

So why giving a 'damn about their "clothing" attitude?

Stop the "does it look right" thing - and take your time for facting.

You really could polish your black crust (I think many scorpions out here?) - but take the distance to other people, who also have an opinion and a free live - and also are able to get thoughts in their heads through.

The world is not only existing with scorpions.

So diversity would be very welcomed - also for the visitors - who also will have different minds.

So stop the "insectoid murder thing" - and come along - that there are a bunch of freedom fighters - who do not want to ruin your "cloth shop" - but want to help you in the mechanicals, e.g.

Don't pull them out. They are fighting for freedom - and need a ground.

Alternative would be to open one's one article-archiv.

Perhaps there is some "concurrency" out there?


--

To D.F.: You have NO RESPECT in cutting of DGE free-speech in last post.


Summary:

Same summary as before:

Why not battling the enemy - instead of "stepping on the schlips" of each others?

C'm on - are you "self-wixer" - or do you want to do something for the people, for your folk and minds?

---

To G.M.: Rauhreif - in my opionion - only has "eaten" the tyrant. Pl - is really a dirt bastard.

He deletes your articles - without understanding them.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You have 2 choices: WITH or WITHOUT us - decide wisely.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


But in all cases - let the authors CORRECT their OWN ARTICLES NOW AND AFTERWARDS. To eliminate errors.

[Hu1]

I made a small statistics:

Rauhreif is since 15 July, 2008 active.
He added 17245 items, these contain 5027 images, 1026 discussion articles, the rest are articles or templates.

Wilhelm Schmitz is since 30 July, 2008 active.
He added 8648 items, these contain 3241 images, 122 discussion articles, the rest are articles or templates.

DGE was since 30. January, 2010 on German Metapedia
He added 1241 items, these contain 153 images, 22 discussion articles, the rest are articles or templates.

(Articles can be moved in the mean time, moving means, add a new one and redirect or delete the existing one, therefore this huge amount.)

The difference between Rauhreif and DGE is roughly an order of magnitude.

[Ajarvarta]

That only tells us - that somebody "talks" a lot.

You can't count the truth in numbers.

What's the content of your post?

Don't forget that the statistics are not real - because of differences while creating - and the time-shift between the kick-outs here discussed.

"Sometimes it feels more like being in a "swinestall".

C#m on sweinis - get real - or you get a hard kick on the ass - he.

And don't forget part-time and full-time posters.

Part-time posters perhaps doing more and different things aside?

But thats your thinking: Youre jobless - and therefore takes it as your full-time job.

That's not comparable men.

And the qualifications, as stated before, are also different.

You tring to false us with your false statistics.

And if youre counting numbers (think of wikipedia) - you end by counting money.

Don't try to poison our souls.

AWAY WITH YOU.

We want justice - for heavens sake.

Think of the "organiced crimers". "They also doing a lot."

But that is no "measuring ideal".

We "measure" in god skills and pay with arian truth. The "one truth" of mankind.

Away with you - and pull your tongue back in your throat:

Number-counting, materialistic animal-human. (e.g. article-selling-jew)


In innovation I would see DGE higher than Rauhreif.

We're here not at the "assembly's line" - he forget that?

It's about truth-holding (ever-living) quality.



DONT'T DO MIND-SELF-SUICIDE. DEVELOP YOURSELF.

-- DON'T FOLLOW THE MIND-BLINDED - DON'T DANCE WITH THE DEATH OR DEVIL. (NONSENSE, POISONED KNOWLEDGE) - DESTROY THEM BOTH - HOLY KNIGHT'S, GOD-FIGHTERS, WHITE MAGICIANS AND TRUE SWASTIKA-FOLLOWING EXORCISTS). --

Thanks for your attention.

[Hu1]

Could anyone get the Spanish Metapedia administrator to come here and comment these charges? Or at least get in contact with me or someone else in the Metapedia Staff?

I have asked Walter Romero to come here to explain, he says:
My friend, my english is very very poor. I speak only spanish or portuguese. But Eosphoros is lying (lies). He published names and photos of people of nationalist ideology in the article [[Pseudonazi]]. It is illegal and immoral. Does not follow the guidelines of Metapedia. Regards. --[[Usuario:Walter Romero|Walter Romero]] 23:49 19 ene 2011 (UTC)

Probably this is Walter refers to:
http://es.metapedia.org/w/index.php?...90&oldid=79677

[DasGewisseEtwas]

Ajarvarta clearly cleared the philosophical positions, thank you. Again, it is really important to realize that one cannot count truth in numbers. As an example for that Rauhreif ignores this simple fact and that he considers “his” encyclopedia to be an assembly’s line, is, repeatedly, the treatment of my article about Opus Dei I cannot explain anymore and again, because I am really concussed about the for me every day more obvious and likewise burdensome fact that witlessness is so deep-seated, and do not want because I have it done often and in depth. In short, he sees articles not dealing with his topic as mere ornament. Maybe because they lure other people to “his” articles, because it satisfies him as Metapedia is a “full-time job” he has fled to; a really sordid human.

Of course I am also enjoyed when the articles I have written entice people to read them, which gusto is a considerable impetus also, but not when there is only dirt around, what only dirty, egomaniacal people prefer.

Hu1: I neither have criticized the work of Franziska Knuppe nor Wilhelm Schmitz. I only question writing for such an encyclopedia, because one is writing in fact for Rauhreif and not for the folk. And Polylux technician’s work is also not bad, but Beria was not a decent man just because he eliminated some Judaic elements with Stalin.

Nobody has got a general right to have any principles. In some barbarian lands it is a principle to cut genitals, in others it was (is?) common to sacrify kids to the gods. If you are for principles, you are supporting Jewish agenda Relativism, including Jews like Melford Spiro and Paul Feyerabend.

It is a, but deficient work to write whole biographies just by using one source. Again, quality instead of quantity.

I do not understand why Jews would be unable to be rough and vain owing to their being talmudical, as it would be contrary.

If I can register just by using my original e-mail address, what is the checkbox “Prevent account creation” for an administrator sees when blocking an user?

Daniel F.: Faith and reason behave like two pans of a balance: To the extent to which one ascends, the other recedes. I do not believe any faith is appropriate in this case.

Your last sentence is a horrible imputation with which you descended to a level I do not dare to describe.

Regarding Walter Romero’s answer: As far as I can see, the phizogs are blackened. The names may be mentioned as well if the persons are public figures. This is neither immoral nor illegal, but the former matters. I abide in a state where it is illegal to voice the truth; you, Hu, too.

[Ajarvarta]

Topic hint (could be a "racial-denier-killer-argument"): "racial-dependance: Spee-Curve"

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spee-Kurve

http://www.white-history.com/hwr1_files/nordskull.JPG


(longer version: from morning - could need more power - powerfuller writing.)

An example with "little racial innovation - that would perhaps cause a severe content-discussion, because of hinting to racial anatomics-differences.

Anatomistic-Diversity-Example: Spee-Curve

The "curve bite" that could be seen from beside between teeth is called "spee-curve".

This curve differs between races - higher peaks are seen on nordic-tooth.

The ignorance of many dentists lead to a significant unhealthy chewing and ortodontic situation.(Functinal-Chewing-Diagnostics)) (Just like knee-ortodontics.)

So what can be done is to give hint of "racial-anatomy-differences".

Here a hint to the german version:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spee-Kurve

Afterwards a nordic scull from beside. Just get aware of the curve that climbs up to the backer molare-tooth.
http://www.white-history.com/hwr1_files/nordskull.JPG

If this curve is made "lineal" - just like many waters - you will get extraordinary -w-r-o-n-g- orthodontic movements.

Hint: Remember the "natural round-bite" and your curve for e.g. restauration purposes.


Thanks for your reading and attention.


--> HAIL TO ARIAN TRUTH-WARRIORS. <--

[Ajarvarta]

[QUOTE=Ajarvarta;571724]Topic hint (could be a "racial-denier-killer-argument"): "racial-dependance: Spee-Curve"

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spee-Kurve

http://www.white-history.com/hwr1_files/nordskull.JPG


(longer version: from morning - could need more power - powerfuller writing.)

An example with "little racial innovation - that would perhaps cause a severe content-discussion, because of hinting to racial anatomics-differences.

Anatomistic-Diversity-Example: Spee-Curve

The "curve bite" that could be seen from beside between teeth is called "spee-curve".

This curve differs between races - higher peaks are seen on nordic-tooth.

The ignorance of many dentists lead to a significant unhealthy chewing and ortodontic situation.(Functinal-Chewing-Diagnostics)) (Just like knee-ortodontics.)

So what can be done is to give hint of "racial-anatomy-differences".

Here a hint to the german version:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spee-Kurve

Afterwards a nordic scull from beside. Just get aware of the curve that climbs up to the backer molare-tooth.
http://www.white-history.com/hwr1_files/nordskull.JPG

If this curve is made "lineal" - just like many waters - you will get extraordinary -w-r-o-n-g- orthodontic movements.

Hint: Remember the "natural round-bite" and your curve for e.g. restauration purposes.


Thanks for your reading and attention.

[Ajarvarta]

-Explanation example--
If someone pisses you at - think of great dunging.

(As example with constructive critic.)

On and lineal neck, comrades - don't get sad about truth things. Force through joy -
KRAFT DURCH FREUDE. We're on your (allfathers troups) sides. For natur-law. Keep by your race.
---

[Ajarvarta]

Another statement for ger.-metapedia:

Quelle: http://schweizerkrieger.wordpress.co.../30/metapedia/

#
socialism4switzerland

Leider hält sich mein Enthusiasmus dieser sogenannten Enzyklopädie gegenüber ziemlich in Grenzen. Ich hab vor einigen Monaten einen Artikel verfasst zu einem Thema, welches man in der Schweiz nicht publizieren darf (Nein es hat nichts mit der Geschichte oder Juden zu tun.)

Ich hab stundenweise Arbeit in diesen Artikel investiert, und es war ein Artikel der für das nationale Lager durchaus von Bedeutung gewesen wäre. 2 Tage nachdem ich ihn fertiggestellt und auf Metapedia hochgeladen hatte, wurde er gelöscht und mein Benutzerkonto gesperrt. Auf Nachfrage teilte man mir mit, dass man davon ausgegangen sei, dass es sich bei mir um eine verdächtige Person handle, weil es ja nicht sein könne, dass ein neuer Benutzer gerade einen so ausführlichen Artikel verfasse. Ausserdem wurde ich der Schleichwerbung bezichtigt. Aus dieser Kritik musste ich entnehmen, dass die Admins meinen Artikel gar nicht geprüft haben, so hab ich nämlich alles mit Quellen belegt.

Mein Fazit aus der Aktion: Leider arbeiten bei Metapedia sehr viele übervorsichtige, rückwärtsgewandte Personen mit, welche wenig wert auf wirkliche Recherche legen. Ich werd mich da jedenfalls nicht mehr engagieren.

#
am 30. September 2010 um 22:15 | Antworten socialism4switzerland

PS: Da ich jetzt natürlich weiss, wie bei Metapedia gearbeitet wird, kann ich auch nicht davon ausgehen, dass die Artikel, welche sich dort befinden wirklich von lexikarischem Wert sind. Von diesem Aspekt her also auch nicht wirklich brauchbar. Sogar bei Wikipedia werden Artikeländerungen öfter kritisch begutachtet.

---

Are we on an idiot farm?

"Go straight for the kill" - Example:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQ-Gbgr4N-k