handdator

Visa fullständig version : Självcensur mer effektivt än totalitarism?



Corrupt
2007-09-21, 05:12
The “Great Firewall of China,” used by the government of the People’s Republic of China to block users from reaching content it finds objectionable, is actually a “panopticon” that encourages self-censorship through the perception that users are being watched, rather than a true firewall, according to researchers at UC Davis and the University of New Mexico.
[—]


Because it filters ideas rather than specific Web sites, keyword filtering stops people from using proxy servers or “mirror” Web sites to evade censorship. But because it is not completely effective all the time, it probably acts partly by encouraging self-censorship, Barr said. When users within China see that certain words, ideas and concepts are blocked most of the time, they might assume that they should avoid those topics.
The original panopticon was a prison design developed by the English philosopher Jeremy Bentham in the 18th century. Bentham proposed that a central observer would be able to watch all the prisoners, while the prisoners would not know when they were being watched.
http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/chinas-eye-internet-fraud-14190.html

(http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/chinas-eye-internet-fraud-14190.html)
Detta är anledningen till att demokrati är världens mest effektiva totalitära system: den påstår sig erbjuda “frihet”, samtidigt som den dogmatiskt demoniserar opposition som politiskt inkorrekt.



http://www.rockabillytree.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/07/Censorship_Press_Obey2.gif

WernerVon Brun
2007-09-21, 11:05
Jag håller med. En stor fördel makthavarna i Sverige har jämfört med DDR tex är just illusionen av yttrandefrihet, åsiktsfrihet etc. En östtysk visste att regimen ljög och manipulerade, hur många svenskar vet det?